Movie Review: The Mule

The MuleClint Eastwood

Earl Stone (Clint Eastwood) makes some important life decisions in The Mule. (Source: Entertainment Weekly)

It has been ten years since Clint Eastwood directed himself in a movie. Being a filmmaker for half of a century, winning two Oscars for directing Unforgiven and Million Dollar Baby (both of which won Best Picture), starring in more than half of the movies he directed, it’s hard not to be impressed by what he has done for Hollywood. Gran Torino is a prime example of his talents as an actor and filmmaker; blending deadpan humor and hard-hitting drama set outside an all-American city–Detroit–and containing a diverse cast.

After directing big hits, such as American Sniper and Sully, he is back as the director after giving us the disastrous biopic The 15:17 to Paris. Not only that, he is also the main star in The Mule. Based on a true story of Leo Sharp, a WWII veteran smuggling hundreds of pounds of cocaine from a Mexican drug cartel through Michigan, Eastwood and screenwriter Nick Schenk make several changes to the true-life story to stand on its own.

For starters, Eastwood stars as Earl Stone, a 90-year-old Korean War veteran, who is facing foreclosure on his house and his horticultural business. Years of being neglected from his family, he is in desperate need of cash. One day, at a wedding party for his granddaughter Ginny (Taissa Farmiga), he is offered a job driving trucks. Earl doesn’t find that a problem since he had experience with trucks. However, he doesn’t know what he’s in for while driving all the way down to El Paso.

Since he has no criminal history, Earl isn’t worried to earn a little extra cash to cover Ginny’s wedding and college education. He eventually finds out he’s working as a drug mule for a Mexican drug cartel. This gets the attention of DEA agents Bates (Bradley Cooper) and Trevino (Michael Peña). Meanwhile, Earl thinks about his life decisions, especially when his ex-wife Mary (Dianne Wiest) falls ill.

This isn’t the first time this year where a legendary actor played a criminal. We already saw Robert Redford using his polite manners while robbing banks in David Lowery’s magnum opus The Old Man and the Gun. As Earl Stone, however, Eastwood gives another nuanced performance; providing the dry sense of humor and the charisma he is known for in all of his movies. Earl might be stubborn and ignorant, especially with the modern technology being taken over, but he tries to be there for his family after neglecting them for years. Although the two DEA agents might be on his tail, he continues to live his life especially sitting back in the driver’s seat of his truck singing along to old songs.

The movie is not without its flaws. It’s a slow-burning film that might throw off a lot of people expecting something along the lines of Sicario. Yes, the pace does drag here and there, and I would have done without the scene where Earl is invited to a pool party at an estate, run by drug lord Laton (Andy Garcia), where there lots of young women everywhere. Nevertheless, there is a great moral in The Mule about the importance of family and putting one’s own life is put at risk for something dangerous. At 88, Eastwood is still going strong. Nothing can stop him now!

3/4

Advertisements

Movie Review: The Nun

the-nun-movie-variety

Sister Irene (Taissa Farmiga) hears something in the darkness in The Nun. (Source: Variety) 

James Wan made two of the best horror movies in recent memory with The Conjuring and The Conjuring 2. He brought the true scary stories to pure life and not only scaring audiences but having them discussing the movies following Ed and Lorraine Warren investigating paranormal activity–from Rhode Island to London. It focused on the atmosphere and the risks these two characters make as opposed to cheap thrills. That’s the case with 2014’s Annabelle, a ventriloquist doll so creepy in the first film took a turn for the worse.

The Conjuring universe has decided to give another creepy entity its own spin-off. Unfortunately, The Nun, directed by Corin Hardy, is another disappointment.

The year is 1952. In a Romanian abbey, two Catholic nuns are attacked by an entity in the form of a nun (Bonnie Aarons). Sister Victoria (Charlotte Hope) ends up committing suicide by hanging herself. Meanwhile, the Vatican hears about the incident and sends Father Burke (Demian Birchir), an expert in exorcism, and Sister Irene (Taissa Farmiga, the sister of Vera) to investigate. With the help of a French-Canadian farmer (Jonas Bloquet), they arrive at the abbey unprepared for what’s in store.

This is the only film in the universe that feels brief and unfinished. It’s filled with cheap scares and forced humor. While the acting is tolerable at best, their motivations aren’t given enough depth. With a semi-promising start, it’s bogged down by a shaky third act. Maxime Alexandre’s cinematography, while gorgeous, doesn’t quite give the movie enough atmosphere.

The Nun does have its moments. One of the only genuinely creepy scenes in the movie is where Father Burke is buried alive in a coffin after witnessing the strong entity. Farmiga gives an impressive performance as a rookie who has yet to receive her vows (shouldn’t she received them before going on that trip?) Her supernatural visions are the main reason she goes to the Romanian mountains. Other than that, I suggest waiting for The Conjuring 3.

1.5/4